Yesterday I pointed out that the headline and first paragraph of this story are completely wrong.
To its credit, the Republic has issued a correction. However instead of fixing the problem they have compounded it by repeating one of the errors in the correction itself. Here's a copy of the page that includes the correction.* And here's a copy of the correction itself.
Did you catch the error? The word "Dodge" describes illegal activity. Attempting to change the law in order to cap a processing fee at $500 is not a "dodge".
Here's the Cambridge definition of "Tax Dodge". Now ask if the fact that the correction claims that this guy is trying to "dodge" a fee instead of a tax will make much difference to his reputation...or to his attorney.