On Thursday the Republic printed yet another horror story about school tax credits, dutifully followedon Friday morning by yet another hand wringing editorial. The Republic has been running this one-two combination every couple weeks for the last few months and last December I described the practice as the Republic's "Jihad against school tax credits."
That prompted this email from Republic Editorial writer Doug MacEachern.
For the record, regarding your reference to an editorial “jihad” (is there a more overworked cliche in the language these days? Just wondering): The Republic recently published a series of editorials recommending changes in the tuition tax-credit law. We explicitly and repeatedly expressed our support for the program, which appears to save the state tax dollars. I urge you go back and read it again. I will assume your mischaracterizations aren’t intentional.
That set me back on my heels. Wow, could I have been so clueless? Does the Republic actually support the Tuition Tax Credit Program and I have somehow missed it? Or is it more likely that Doug has simply failed to notice the extent to which the Republic has piled on this issue?
Conveniently the latest Republic article linked to all the previous Republic articles so we have a nice little list--compiled by the Republic itself--to test my theory. When you read the list, remember that most of the stories are either A 1 above the fold, or B 1 above the fold. Also notice that the "Investigation" stories are what is called in the business "Enterprise" stories. In other words, they have no triggering event--the reporter has an opinion and calls a handful of experts to see if they will confirm it.
Then recall that "news" stories on A1 and B1 are supposed to be neutral, while the opinions of the paper are supposed to be confined to the editorial pages. I assume they still teach that at J school. Read through the headlines and ask yourself if the news articles are neutral--or if they are simply editorials masking as news.
Finally, assess for yourself whether Doug is right that the "We explicitly and repeatedly expressed our support for the program..." and then determine if my description of a "Jihad" (trite though it may be) has "mischaracterized" the Republic's coverage.
Here's the list of articles, simply cut and pasted from yesterday article.
Republic Investigations
8/1/09: Tuition-aid benefits wealthy families, raises worry
8/1/09: Tax-credit work raises ethical questions
8/1/09: Expenses hard to track for tax-credit groups
9/6/09: Charter schools tapping into private dollars
9/21/09: Tax-credit program scrutiny often lags in Arizona
10/2/09: Schools under scrutiny for financing private school with taxpayer dollars
10/14/09: 'Republic' analysis: Tuition tax credits drain state money
10/20/09: Private-school tax credits save $8.3 million
10/29/09: Tuition aid for Arizona kids in need not doled out
11/13/09: Arizona may sue tuition groups holding donations
11/15/09: Tuition aid not just to needy
12/13/09: Tuition aid continues to elude needy
12/27/09: Ariz. tuition-credit practices may violate federal tax laws
News Coverage
8/12/09:IRS urged to investigate tuition tax-credit offer
9/1/09:Diocese alters tuition-tax-credit rules for donors
9/22/09: Legislators expected to tighten school-tuition tax-credit rules
10/22/09:Attorneys to ask high court to review Ariz. tuition tax credits
11/17/09:Professor puts savings for state at up to $186 million
11/17/09:Clearer data on scholarships sought
12/11/09:Panel backs only some reforms on private-school tuition law
Republic Editorials
Act now to halt abuses of tuition tax-credit law
Lawmakers must save tuition tax-credit program
Steps to a better tuition law
Law failed to define just who is needy
Earmarking at the core of problem
Lack of detail rotting ideals of program
Legislators put school-choice efforts in peril
Legislators bet IRS won't catch on to shady practice
Recent Comments