Subscribe to EspressoPundit

« Renzi in the Wall St. Journal | Main | Ketchup Day »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451db8169e200d834543de869e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Damage Control:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Greg,

I was working all day - just read the Saturday newspaper - yes, I read both stories about APS.

Talk about the luck of the Irish!

Notice the headline: "Palo Verde software is breached" -

not: "National security breached"

not: "Palo Verde secrets stolen"

When I saw the headline, I thought, "oh, somebody, did a 'no-no' at the plant - but when I read the article - well, let's say I was furious.

Notice the side bar heading - "Ex-worker used it during trip to Iran, officials say." What is he doing using Palo Verde software in Iran who is trying to build a nuclear reactor!!!

Remember the guy from AZ who changed his name in the Navy and gave away 'secrets' and how that was 'no big deal' - hello, it was and is a big deal now!

Give me a break!

We don't need to worry about terrorists coming here - we have an incompotent government and an incompotent security systems!

And we won't talk about the salary of Mr. Post who wants more of my utility dollars. I think it is time to buy one stock of Pinnacle West and go and complain!

ron

Greg, you wrote, "Of course, Palo Verde is rated as the lowest performing Nuclear Plant in the nation."

Greg, you missed an important clarifying clause as it relates to 'lowest performing'.

The sentence should read thus: "Of course, Palo Verde is rated the lowest performing Nuclear Plant in relation to safety standards in the nation."

The plant has been out of compliance with federal standards related to safety from its first day of operaton and currently is rated in the worst category.

We are not talking about kwh performance- we are talking about safety performance - and most of us live downwind from it.

Once again the news media has blown the story out of proportion. The software in question was training software provided by a vendor. It was not used to run the plant. The breach did not occur at the plant. As best I can tell from the story, the breach occurred at the vendor site.

Note that the person in question was a trainer for APS at Palo Verde for years. He’s got a whole lot more in his head about the actual operation than is contained in the training software he downloaded. Apparently he was trying to peddle something. Exactly what we don’t know.

The comments to this entry are closed.