The most difficult issues for the Legislature to get right are vice issues. If a legislator raises a question about laws governing prostitution or pornography, he or she is inevitably branded as soft on porn, or pro prostitution.
That's why mere possession of child pornography carries a life sentence without possibility of parole. Lot's of Legislators think that's too harsh, but no one is able to change it. Senator Barbara Leff, for example, tried to raise the culpability standard from "knowingly" to "intentionally" possessing child pornography and was unfairly pummeled by one of the local blogs.
Frankly, it's the blogs and the political opponents who are usually guilty of making unsophisticated claims that "Legislator Jones is soft on porn." The mainstream media doesn't usually fall for this trick. It's not likely that you are going to see a headline that says "Legislator Opposes Child Prostitution Bill."
Well, I'll say that the mainstream media doesn't usually fall for this trick. Until now. Check out this A1 above the fold Tribune article by Dennis Welch.
Legislator opposes child prostitution bill
A bill that would stiffen penalties for those who force children into prostitution has new life, despite an influential East Valley lawmaker’s attempts to kill it.
Rep. Eddie Farnsworth had the guts to point out that the child prostitution bill might be more harsh than the Legislature actually intended. As Judiciary Chairman, Farnsworth had the power to stop the bill.
Now, I don't want to get all stereotypical on you, but one wouldn't expect a Republican East Valley Mormon Legislator with six daughters and political ambitions to point out that the proposed child prostitution statute may be too severe. And if he does--especially since he's an attorney--it's probably a pretty good idea to pay attention to what he says.
Instead of trying to figure out if Farnsworth was right, Tribune Reporter Dennis Welch went for the easy hit piece.
Normally, that's when I would have a few espressos and write a 1,500 word screed about how lame and unsophisticated Welch's story is. But in this case, I don't have to. In a stunning move, the Tribune's own Editorial Board took Welch apart before I could get to him.
Tribune writer Dennis Welch reported Monday the bill has been delayed for weeks because Rep. Eddie Farnsworth, R-Gilbert, opposed removal of that defense. Farnsworth courageously argued heavy felony punishments should be applied only to those who actually intend to commit the crime involved. This may seem to be a subtle distinction, as adult prostitution also is illegal, but it’s an important difference in the pursuit of justice.
The Tribune Editorial Board seemed to go out of its way to let readers know it was specifically rebutting its own reporter.
Farnsworth has been accused of not caring about the dangers of child prostitution, Welch reported, a criticism that is blatantly unfair. Farnsworth wants to prevent unintentional harm to more children, and adults, through an unjust law.
Wow. Good for the Trib! Newspapers gain a lot of credibility when they are willing to call out their own reporters. Front page hit pieces shouldn't be tolerated and it's great to know that the bloggers aren't the only ones paying attention.
Recent Comments