Subscribe to EspressoPundit

« You didn't actually think it was spontaneous did you? | Main | Sorry about the lack of posts. »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451db8169e2011278fbd60d28a4

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The First Step is to Admit that You have a Problem.:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I still want to know what do-gooder stole, er, consulted all that money away.

$60M is wasteful even by Tucson Democrat standards. I smell fraud.

Excellent, Greg.

You missed a few salient points, not the least of which where they had to get their digs in on the GOP majority in the legislature:

"The committee summoned Shelko to Phoenix and was waiting to ambush him, eager to grab the money from the tax increment finance district that funds Rio Nuevo and use it to help balance the state's projected $2.4 billion shortfall next year."

So, essentially, the Star is saying that they support cutting it for the same reasons that the legislature supports cutting it but the GOP is evil and the Star was just irresponsibly optimistic. Republicans lie in wait to “ambush” while the Star liberals are somehow only “victims of their own optimism” in this whole sorry affair. Gee, so now asking what they did with the money is an “ambush”. That they were going to be casting a critical eye on the project was a surprise to anyone? Just absolutely juvenile posturing at the Star.

And then they are presenting Councilwoman Romero's suggestion for a change in direction involving a focus on infrastructure and revenue production. I liked that idea too...when Representative Frank Antenori called for it months ago. Typical that the Star condemns a Republican for saying something and then compliments a Democrat for “borrowing” his idea.

But the entire reversal of their editorial stance on this issue with scant acknowledgement that they were completely wrong on the issue. Oh they did say that they had "hoped against hope" that it would work. More like they "hoped" while ignoring an avalanche of evidence that they themselves repeatedly published.

That's the whole problem with this whole hope thing. I "hope" Tucson will have a crosstown freeway someday but I know the realities of this pipe dream.

They also apparently misidentified the Ward of Councilwoman Trasoff judging by several of the online comments but they apparently corrected that in the online version.

I don't think the Star admitted they have a problem, they just softened their position, reaffirmed their hatred of Republicans, and are trying to move forward acting like nobody noticed the gallon of milk that they spilled on the carpet in the form of their prior editorial stance on Rio Nuevo.

The dullards at the Star's opinion section probably don't think that they HAVE a problem. They can be in denial all they want but the 20 cents a share report card that the market is giving them is one strong Op-Ed.

The comments to this entry are closed.