Thank you!
The Senate Education Committee approved my nomination to the Board of Regents by a 6-1 vote. The Committee recommendation must now go to the full Senate, but Committee is the hard part.
I have been deeply touched by the level of support that I have received. Thank you to Governor Brewer and her staff for nominating me and for sticking with me. They did a great job working with the Committee members to ensure that their concerns were addressed.
And Thank you to the Committee members themselves--Sens. Crandall, Lewis and Gray had some concerns but were willing to meet with me for several hours to work through them. I appreciate their time and patience. Thank you to Sens. Barto, Klein and Smith for their kind words and support--and most of all for their yes votes! Thank you to Senator Schapira for engaging me in a robust discussion of my views--I'll send you a copy of my laundry tab for removing the sweat stains from my suit.
Thank you to my friends who stepped up to support me--one person in particular gave me some candid advice that was very helpful. Thank you to him.
I only turned in one letter of recommendation--but since it was from Betsey Bayless that was enough. Thank you to Betsey for her initial letter and for her letter to the editor in support as well. That really means a lot. MIHS Chairman "Bick" Bicknell wrote a great letter to the editor as well. Thank you Bick!
I had a lot of my friends from the past chime in on my behalf--special thanks to Bill Mundell who not only wrote a letter in support, but attended the hearing and was ready to testify if needed. Ed Phillips, wrote a letter in support as well. Thank you.
Stan Barnes expressed his support by texting me a couple "way to go" notes during my testimony...I should have turned off the phone--but I always appreciate his encouragement...not to mention his 20 plus years of close friendship.
Speaking of life-long friends, David Schweikert was quick to step up and voice his support as well.
There have literally been hundreds of people who have expressed support for my nomination and I appreciate all of their kind words and efforts on my behalf. Thank you all.
If I am confirmed by the full Senate, I look forward to starting a new chapter in my life.
Speaking of new chapters...you may have read that Espresso Pundit is going to go dark for a while.
I think the Regents position is similar in stature to a Judiciary appointment. I don't think I can serve as a sitting Regent and blog the way I have blogged in the past. So I'm going to put the espresso machine in the attic for a while.
I'll probably end with a few more "wrap up" posts and then sign off for a while. If I return, it will be in a reinvented format that I haven't thought of yet. (Of course, writing is an obsession, so I will have to find some type of outlet or I will explode into a zillion little over-caffeinated pieces.)
So thank you for seven years of readership. We have had a great run, you and me. Thank you for stepping up and helping me when I needed it most. And thank you again to Governor Brewer for her faith and support.
May God Bless You All.
Congratulations!
I would still like to see The Year in Books - 2011.
Posted by: Craig | April 09, 2012 at 07:22 PM
Thank you Greg and I know you will do well on ABOR.
Posted by: Benson | April 09, 2012 at 07:26 PM
Was this all just a liberal plot to shut your blog down?
Posted by: Bard | April 09, 2012 at 07:33 PM
We'll miss you, Greg! Watching the MSM collaspe won't be as fun without you... ;-)
Posted by: Its a Dry Heat | April 09, 2012 at 07:59 PM
There goes my major newsfeed for what's going on in the area.
I wish you all the best but I'm looking forward to your return.
Posted by: David, Chandler, AZ | April 09, 2012 at 08:15 PM
The Regent position will prove to be less influential than your work on this blog. The pen is mightier than the sword (and the bureaucracy that goes with it).
Don't go dark, dammit. No one cares if you don't blog the ACC, because no one cares about the ACC. But if you stop blogging the red meat topics in Arizona politics we will all suffer. I guess the good news is that others might just take up the opportunity if you fade out, so I do have some hope.
Posted by: Son of September | April 09, 2012 at 09:07 PM
The blogosphere's potential loss (which I hope doesn't happen) is definitely the ABOR's gain. You are exactly who that board needs!
Posted by: Doug | April 09, 2012 at 09:50 PM
Oh no!! Now you're going to have me hoping that your nomination is voted down.
Well, not really, but you will be missed.
Posted by: BobH | April 09, 2012 at 09:51 PM
Congrats! You have tremendous talent and a great opportunity to serve AZ. I have faith that you will grow in those areas that need some additional work in order for you to fully use the gifts with which God has blessed you. As for Espresso Pundit: I have enjoyed it over the years, but I think you are facing a 1 Corinthians 13:11 moment. You are smart and entertaining as a blogger, but AZ needs more from you now.
Posted by: BCM | April 09, 2012 at 10:36 PM
Sorry, BCM, there's nothing "childish" about Espresso Pundit. It's a great town hall-type format to discuss important topics. And there's nothing wrong with having a bit of fun, too.
Nevertheless, congrats to you, Greg, wishing you all the best.
Posted by: Ron Bellus | April 09, 2012 at 10:57 PM
Congrats Greg. The espresso will be greatly missed. Good luck in your next venture!
Posted by: Dean Ouellette | April 09, 2012 at 11:59 PM
Congratulations. Maybe you could write the Regents Newsletter.
Posted by: Matt | April 10, 2012 at 12:00 AM
Its been a great ride. Hopefully someone else will pick up the mantle of keeping the Republic (somewhat) honest.
Best of luck!
Posted by: Kevin McNeill | April 10, 2012 at 12:16 AM
I'm with David from Chandler...where else am I going to go to get the behind-the-scenes political hoo-hah in AZ?
...seriously, though, any recommendations?
Posted by: Laurie | April 10, 2012 at 12:23 AM
I will miss your perspective on government and media. The local rag referred to you as a "controversial blogger". If by controversy they mean "doesn't use spell check" I agree. Of course when you are conservative they call you controversial. Now, take someone who incites overthrow of an elected body and causes a TUSD meeting to be cancelled...that's thoughtful reasoned rational discussion from Threesome Morons.
Anyway, I've greatly enjoyed reading your posts and will miss this. Your tone was always civil, you were unabashedly conservative, but you seemed to give all sides a break.
I think ABOR is getting a bright, effective new regent who will be asking tough questions, demanding accountability, and will have a positive impact on the state university system. I think there will be a lot of very good discussion of the issues between you and the other regents and I also think that they know that, even Sen Schapira. From what I read you handled his question pretty well.
Best of luck to you.
Posted by: Stewie | April 10, 2012 at 12:59 AM
I could see expecting you to refrain from posting about university issues, but a total shutdown seems excessive to me. We need insight from people with your connections and experience. You'll be missed on the net.
Posted by: Copper Dome | April 10, 2012 at 01:44 AM
All the best in your new position. I will miss your blog. I hope you will be as candid and fresh moving on.
Posted by: David Hasseltine | April 10, 2012 at 04:50 AM
Congrats Mr Patterson! Hopefully your stint in public life (again) goes better than Evil Mr Patterson.
Posted by: Charlie W | April 10, 2012 at 09:52 AM
Congrats, Greg -- and God Bless you and yours.
Posted by: Joe G. | April 10, 2012 at 10:15 AM
Congratulations, Greg. I will miss the blog.
Posted by: westsider | April 10, 2012 at 10:19 AM
I believe you had more pull, push and persuasion here in the blogosphere.
However, I'm EXPECTING great things from you and the Board of Regents now ... you have a calling and a mandate to not let these institutions continue in their current wayward philanthropic direction with tax payer money.
Congratulations!
Posted by: Tod | April 10, 2012 at 10:36 AM
Congratulations Mr. Patterson despite the lone voice of dissent, David Schapira. What was he thinking? Schapira's stated reason was exactly where you brought value. Good luck.
Posted by: M Cylkowski | April 10, 2012 at 10:38 AM
Congratulations and good luck.
Posted by: mahtso | April 10, 2012 at 11:12 AM
I know you say Sen. Schapira engaged you in robust discussion at the hearing, but his opposition is misguided. His chief complaint was that you criticized the Regents in your posts (Oh, the horror!). Sounds to me like Schapria just wants another rubber stamp on the Board instead of someone who will actually hold feet to the fire with our universities. Glad he lost his battle. Now get to work - Arizona needs you.
Posted by: Gordie Howe | April 10, 2012 at 12:18 PM
First Casey Newton, now you. Conway sad!
Posted by: Conway | April 10, 2012 at 12:45 PM
Congratulations, but Espresso Pundit going dark will be a very serious loss for the Arizona political arena. You really do have more influence through the blog than you could ever have as a Regent.
I can only hope that some as-yet-unknown rises to at least partially fill the deep void this will cause.
Posted by: UnTed | April 10, 2012 at 12:54 PM
You are too kind in your comments regarding Schapira's questioning (I'm sure we all understand why). He was disengenuous in his questions and comments. More than once Schapira prefaced his questioning and commenting with: "This has nothing to do with your blogging about me." (Me thinks he doth protest too much.) And then he hides behind the Republic's editorial rants against you. Bad form.
Congrats to you; hopefully Espresso Pundit won't be dark for long.
Posted by: RonJ | April 10, 2012 at 01:40 PM
Congrats, Greg. Please don't sell the espresso machine. At least keep it going for a while and see if you can find some niches you feel at liberty to cover. Maybe recruit a co-blogger -- maybe Alice in Stan's shop? You should realize the community importance of maintaining your status as a blogger -- if you lose that, how would the Republic ever be able to characterize you? CPA? Attorney? Regent? Hospital board member? No, those would never work. Ya gotta keep the blogger title, if only for the satisfaction of the Republic.
Posted by: George | April 10, 2012 at 02:04 PM
I'm really going to miss your posts, Greg. Some of the best commentary and political analysis out there. This election cycle will not be the same without you. Congratulations on your appointment.
Posted by: Mike Liburdi | April 10, 2012 at 04:48 PM
Anyone else see the irony regarding the trade of academic freedom for academic power? On the other hand, If they couldn't remove Mathis from the IRC, they couldn't remove Greg from the BOR.
Posted by: Son of September | April 10, 2012 at 06:03 PM
One of the ways the powers deal with critics is to promote them into a place where they lose the power to be critical of them. It is an effective silencing technique.
Posted by: westsider | April 10, 2012 at 06:30 PM
westsider: This is three times in two weeks we agree. It must be the Apocalypse. ;-)
Posted by: RonJ | April 10, 2012 at 06:35 PM
Fantastic news.
How ironic that a one-day campaign in the Repugnant openly aimed to shelve your appointment - leads to - overwhelming outpouring of support - leading in turn to -A COMPLETE REVERSAL AND ULTIMATE VICTORY.
In about as short a time! Simply icing on the cake. Well earned & well done.
Of course it is a difficult trade off knowing that your insightful blog is going dark.
That said, I can't agree that BOR is just some roundabout way to shut up the Espresso.
To the contrary. Given your qualities and qualifications, I've no doubt you will lead and accomplish great things in a vital area of public service.
It is very reassuring that there is a comon sense conservative at the table there - especially at a time when the trust in government bodies is so low here in Arizona.
Best of luck and thanks for everything.
Posted by: Phoenix48 | April 10, 2012 at 08:13 PM
God bless you, Greg. I rarely comment, but I check every day. Your voice in this forum will be missed. Thank you for sharing with us your knowledge.
Posted by: DawnMB | April 10, 2012 at 09:36 PM
I'll feel lonesome in my schadenfreude watching the MSM crashing down! Perhaps another local blog will pick up the mantle and run with it. Like maybe Exurban League. Whom I know to have been busy recently. But seriously. Hint Hint . . .
Posted by: John | April 10, 2012 at 09:55 PM
Paging David Dodenhoff
Posted by: Son of September | April 10, 2012 at 11:08 PM
Thanks, Greg, for the memories. You've run a great blog, and it's been great fun hanging out here. Best wishes for the future.
Over and out.
Posted by: Dewey | April 11, 2012 at 02:01 AM
I'm with RonJ and Westsider. If this appointment has the side effect of shutting down the Pundit, then it's as much curse as blessing. I wish you the best of luck wherever your life and fortunes take you, but the loss of this blog will be hard on Arizona politics.
Posted by: Dave K. | April 11, 2012 at 10:15 AM
So, I've been busy for a long time and I finally check back and this is the post I see?
I take full responsibility for this epic disaster.
If I promise to do better and check in daily, will you come back?
I know. Start an anonymous blog. I won't tell. Come on!!
Posted by: Travis | April 11, 2012 at 11:08 AM
Greg: a lot late to the dance, but congratulations on your appointment. You very favorably impressed me the brief time I had to interact with you (something about the corp commission, years ago) and I have every belief that you'll do an excellent job on the ABOR
Jim Junker
Posted by: A Facebook User | April 11, 2012 at 01:10 PM
It should be pointed out somewhere in a public forum that the letter to the editor endorsing Mr. Patterson's appointment that was printed in the Arizona Republic from Maricopa Integrated Healthcare System President and CEO Betsey Bayless was a flagrant violation of MIHS policy regarding political activity.
MIHS policy prohibits any employee from identifying themselves as an employee of the district and making any political endorsement. The policy states that MIHS employees "shall not" make any political endorsements with the words "shall not" in bold face with the word "not" underlined. The policy also explicitly defines the term "employee" to include officers of the Maricopa Integrated Healthcare System, which would include Ms. Bayless. The policy does not exempt anyone under any circumstance. I am not, as a district employee, allowed to identify myself as such and make any political endorsement. The front page of the policy bears the name of Betsey Bayless, President and CEO of the MIHS.
Bayless had absolutely no business making a political endorsement in this situation. I am curious to see if any disciplinary action will be taken against her. As an employee, I could always complain to the Special Health Care District Board. But then, I'd be complaining to Greg Patterson and Elbert Bicknell, who also wrote a letter to the editor. I suppose my complaints would fall on deaf ears.
It's nice to know there are rules that all of us must follow and then there are rules that the chosen few are allowed to walk all over. Nice one, Betsey.
Posted by: MIHS Employee | April 11, 2012 at 01:22 PM
Get a rope!
Posted by: RonJ | April 11, 2012 at 01:51 PM
I want to join the chorus discouraging you from stopping the blogging. You have always been thought provoking and very inciteful. I will now have to look elsewhere when handicapping the elections. Congratulations and good luck.
Posted by: Steve O | April 11, 2012 at 02:41 PM
Try going to S.H.I.E.L.D. armorandshield.blogspot.com
Greg, you have been fantastic and will be missed. Thank you.
Posted by: Anita Christy | April 11, 2012 at 10:41 PM
I'm going to miss RonJ's comments. Seriously, I don't always agree with them but I can't read them without thinking of my Grandpa (in a good way). Congrats on the appointment.
Posted by: Dave | April 12, 2012 at 12:47 PM
I just heard a clip of Steve Gallardo walking the dangerous ground that only libs dare to tread, classifying people by skin color and the "they don't look like me". Apparently the seat Mr. Patterson is being replaced is the Hispanic chair? (according to Gallardo.)
Rep. Gallardo, are you a big? racist? obsessive about skin color? Ethno-superiority?
Posted by: chick | April 12, 2012 at 01:34 PM
Greg,
You have been one of my best connections for Arizona news. You will be greatly missed. Good luck on your new adventures and send us all an email when you start blogging again!
Tim Carlson (former Arizonan)
Taguig City, Philippines
Posted by: Timothy S. Carlson | April 13, 2012 at 04:16 AM
Dave: I think I'll take that as a compliment as I reach for my walker.
Posted by: RonJ | April 13, 2012 at 12:59 PM
I hate to interrupt the going away party. But I have some questions.
Did anyone else besides me notice those two very sharp twists in the road? Very very very sharp twists, if fact. So sharp and so twisty I have to wonder what happened.
Twist number one begins with Rich Crandall removing Greg Patterson's name from the agenda of the Senate Education Committee, which he chairs, and telling the Arizona Republic that he has some concerns about Mr. Patterson and has heard from the business community that they'd like to see someone from a business background on the Board of Regents.
Not a very surprising twist. Crandall is a moderate who did not support the anti-immigrant agenda of former Senate President Russell Pearce. He's endorsed Bob Wolsey, Pearce's opponent in the Republican primary as Pearce seeks to return to the legislature. Patterson is obviously in the Pearce camp. His job description in the Pearce camp varies from chief cheerleader to head honcho hatchet man. I was not at all surprised to see Crandall hold up Patterson's nomination.
Big twist: Crandall puts Patterson back on the agenda, and Crandall and Jerry Lewis vote in favor of Patterson. It's a surprise coming from Crandall. It's an outright shock coming from Lewis, after Patterson's treatment of him last fall. Sharp and twisty as sharp and twisty can be.
Big sharp twist number 2: On his post titled "It's a honor to be nominated," dated April 2, 2012, Patterson states: "Actually, I have a strict "no blogging about clients" policy. That's why you don't read about the Hospital or the Corporation Commission in Espresso Pundit. If confirmed, I won't be blogging about the Regent." Simple and straight ahead, espresso with nothing on the side. Patterson says unequivocally that he intends to keep blogging.
Sharp twist number 2 takes a really strange sharp twist. The Senate Education Committee approves Patterson's nomination. Patterson announces he's shutting down the Espresso Pundit blog. Here you have it:
"Speaking of new chapters...you may have read that Espresso Pundit is going to go dark for a while.
I think the Regents position is similar in stature to a Judiciary appointment. I don't think I can serve as a sitting Regent and blog the way I have blogged in the past. So I'm going to put the espresso machine in the attic for a while."
A Judiciary appointment? Oh really? Hogwash. In what way is serving on the Board of Regents similar to a Judiciary appointment? Patterson will be presiding over court cases? He's going to show up at meetings wearing a powdered wig and a robe? People will address him as "Your Honor?"
Serving on the Board of Regents involves overseeing the State's university system. Very much like being on the Health Care District Board involves overseeing a hospital and a network of clinics. Patterson did not stop blogging when he was elected to the Health Care District Board. He clearly did not, at first, plan to stop blogging if his nomination to the Board of Regents was confirmed.
Am I the only one who thinks big twist in the road number 1 and even bigger twist in the road number 2 are probably connected? In fact, intertwined with one another? To put it very bluntly, straight espresso with no milk: Did Crandall and Lewis demand the shut down of the Espresso Pundit blog as a condition of confirming Patterson's appointment? Was there a behind closed doors meeting where this agreement was reached? If no such agreement took place, what other explanation is there for the twisty twists in this story?
I think the question deserves an answer.
I'd also love to see Patterson in powdered wig. Just kidding.
Posted by: Elbert Bayless | April 13, 2012 at 03:40 PM
While I'm very happy about your appointment, I am also saddened by the loss of the blog. Yours was always the first I would check and often the most insightful.
I wish you the best on the ABOR. I suspect that you realize more than most that our higher learning system needs as big a change as the news business has been undergoing for a number of years. Disruptive technologies and techniques are always very hard on those who are reliant on the status quo. May your analyses and insights be of great benefit to the ABOR and the citizens and students of Arizona.
Posted by: Ken Ekström | April 13, 2012 at 10:49 PM